SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (54655)6/29/1999 1:32:00 PM
From: Bill  Respond to of 67261
 
Hahahaha!! ROTFLMAO. That's definitely one of the funniest posts I've read in a month! You ought to go into show business!



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (54655)6/29/1999 1:46:00 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 67261
 
"That's the way I see all this." Yep. Cocked eyed as usual. JLA



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (54655)6/29/1999 3:20:00 PM
From: truedog  Respond to of 67261
 
to: Michelle Harris
from: truedog

Here, again, you make a huge point of the income of pro-choice women. Another clear indication , for all to see, that you have chosen mammon as your god. This makes you religeous!! You are worshiping a diety!! You make it clear, that you would commit any act in the pursuit of money. We all should pity you.

truedog



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (54655)6/29/1999 3:47:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Well. One might expect that demographically pro-choice wymyn will make more money than pro-life women since pro-choice wymyn will go so far as to murder their own children to make a buck. Moreover, pro-life women are probably more likely to have and raise children instead of acting like men with vaginas.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (54655)6/29/1999 4:20:00 PM
From: miraje  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
But anyway these guys like Rush Limbaugh want to marry non-working women to make them feel better about themselves. But then they have financial problems making things work, and they have to create tax advantages for themselves.

Actually, Michelle, single wage earning households, (50's nuclear family style), pay no marriage penalty. It's when both husband and wife work, and earn comparable salaries, that the penalty applies. And it can be fairly substantial in some cases. Eliminating the marriage tax penalty is an issue that people across the ideological spectrum should support.

JB