To: Seth L. who wrote (1126 ) 6/29/1999 2:56:00 PM From: Noneyet Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2891
PS: This part of your post ( referenced below )is technically incorrect also. It is not negative posters who are sarcastic, uninformed, snooty or any such other word you wish to use. That is a lie. Additionally, negative posters have been more accurate as to this stocks direction than any 10 bullish posters have been for the past three years. The treatment on this board of negative posters is and was WELL DOCUMENTATED , as many bullish posters who have done the attacking have been removed. You only need reference Brad Dryer post on Ftel for documentation of this disregarded fact. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 16) Mob lynching of negative posters Not a material fact to the investment just a fact that negative posters are for the most part sarcastic, uniformed, snooty, irresponsible, and generally wrong. that of course is just my not meant to offensive you of late. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The above is an absolut falsehood and you well know that. You must technically delete your items numbers as follows, or provide documentation ( that is public information ) of those items as facts. 2) MaGruder resigned according to fnet. No formal announcement that he poorly managed fnet, and furthermore proof of such. 3) No proof of increased revenues. 6) No documentation of this claim. 9) JM Best is scarred with his ad. beside there is no way of verifying that company's growth. 12) This claim needs documentation. 17) Sales documentation 22) Another undocumented statement. 23) Another undocumented statement. 25) Another undocumented statement. 26) Another undocumented statement.