Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: miraje who wrote (54806)	6/29/1999 5:02:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 67261

Yes... ok... thats what I thought. My objection to repealing the marriage penalty then is rooted in my belief that the right is for it as another of their social engineering ploys to encourage stay at home moms. Either situation (marriage penalty or no) is unfair in one way or the other. Consumption taxes are looking better and better to me as the best alternative. If the US incurred consumption taxes in internet sales for example revenue would come from all kinds of sources that are not taxpayers now, and in some ways should be since the internet is a global invention used by everybody and yet financed only by the US.