Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mineman who wrote (2668)	6/29/1999 8:56:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Respond to of 4504

<<TG3 is a geophysical anomaly only whereas TGI is a gravity anomaly>> You need a some definitions. A gravity anomaly is a geophysical observation made using geophysical survey. A geophysical anomaly is simply the same thing... an anomaly obeserved by one or more geophysical methods. <<TG3 does not therefore have the same signature as TG1 and the odds are that pyrite.. or some similar natural occurrance has caused the anomaly rather than gold-bearing sulphides. >> First TG3 and TG1 have exact same signature. Second, I hope there is pyrite as that is where the copper, zinc is as well as other "...ite". Thirs, the sulfides are not gold-bearing but predominantly copper and xinc. BTW, I forgot to told you that the oxidixed cap is barite-oxide. So it is possible that they may have another commercial rpoduct in there: barium.