Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : XSNI - X-Stream Network -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LANCE B who wrote (1639)	6/30/1999 8:24:00 AM
From: Dale Baker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3519

Wayne's post was made after the close on a Thursday around 7PM. XSNI ran the next day, then gapped and crashed on the Monday. Make of it what you will. And if you want a "value" penny stock look at WEIR, a low-end retailer coming out of bankruptcy. I am long from 13/16 and plan to hold for a while (now 1 1/8). I also have a Hong Kong stock which trades as FPAFF on the NASDAQ. They are my only penny holdings.

To: LANCE B who wrote (1639)	6/30/1999 8:32:00 AM
From: donkeyman	Respond to of 3519

X-Sream Question:--I wonder when x-stream had that big meeting with Lehman Brothers concerning an IPO? Were they told by Lehman Brothers to put out no X-Stream news releases and keep quiet for a period of time while they tried to put this complicated IPO process together? Or were they told, Lehman Brothers will be answering any questions about X-Stream's IPO work, therefore all your X-Stream management in the UK and Canada should also not refuse any phone calls, answer all questions, report any company rumors (especially concerning joint ventures) but try not to get your wires crossed too much with us.??? Were they told most of the information you give will be reported on the chat lines and you can depend once repeated there, that information is always "100% correct"--So don't worry about putting the IPO off track, there are other way's in reaching the Nasdaq Big Board.!!!

To: LANCE B who wrote (1639)	6/30/1999 10:43:00 AM
From: Jacalyn Deaner	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3519

lance - uh, OK: To: LANCE B From: Jacalyn Deaner Tuesday, Jun 29 1999 11:11PM ET Lance,m I did go to Tom at the very beginning and asked him for the correct numbers, he said they ARE CORRECT and for me to "get lost" in other words, I was bugging him. That to me is not a good way to get validation and verification. He gave me more wrong numbers and names and when I asked him about it, he told me to mind my own business. What DUH? I gave him plenty of time to answer up and prove up or just explain that he was NOT INTERESTED instead he denied any part. WRONG ANSWER on his part. I will not apologize to him nor rumball - when I asked politely for 2 weeks for help, and it is all evidenced in my posts on their threads wherever they HID and changed their names but I was able to track them down - they told me to "@#@$ off". particularly tom (rumball was easy to find because he started the thread) regardless, that is where I stand and why I stand in my position, $hit on me once shame on you $hit on me twice shame on me. I don't care about a particular person's trading technique nor skill, we are all in the market to make money and get "the big one" - I however, don't make $hitting on people a preferred means to my end. Good luck and good bye, Jacalyn A person is known by the company he or she keeps - that is the mirror you should be looking into. I like my mirror, and you have told me you like yours - I am glad we don't have the same mirrors.