Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Devlin who wrote (2727)	6/30/1999 11:55:00 AM
From: mineman	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 4504

Investors will each decide whether they want to assimilate information from Elizabeth Andrews or myself and they do not need anyone telling them that we have an "agenda"! My only agenda is to present much-needed factual opinions based on my 35 years experience assessing mining projects from all over the world.

To: Ed Devlin who wrote (2727)	6/30/1999 12:30:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4504

Ed, I agree... But I would not worry. SI is only a small portion of the market. Look at the stock price... those tactics rarely work. The market knows too well the potential of MAN. Play your own game, apply your discipline rules, take some profits (as we did) on the way up. And you should be OK. Also keep in mind that entering such debates is healthy as it forces us to better understand our investments. This being said, remember that mining is speculative sector full of surprises. I hope the next one will be TG-3.