Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg Smith who wrote (12549)	6/30/1999 1:01:00 PM
From: FMK	Respond to of 27311

Greg, Weren't you among the prolific posters touting ULBI and knocking Valence when ULBI went to $20 per share? Why is ULBI now less than Valence? If you recall, I posted on several occasions that Valence's production capacity of solid polymer dwarf's ULBI's and their share prices were out of line. Now I see they have gotten more in line, but Valence share price is still very low compared to ULBI's in terms of rechargeable solid polymer capability. Could you please explain how ULBI is doing and what their current production rates are for solid polymer? Do you believe Valence's 400 patents have any effect on ULBI? While on the subject, how many patents does ULBI have?

To: Greg Smith who wrote (12549)	6/30/1999 2:24:00 PM
From: Tickertype	Respond to of 27311

<<Maybe H-V was forced to purchase sub-standard material from the NI line because it couldn't be made into viable commercial samples for any independent customers.>> Now, the bashers here resort to all kinds of nonsense, but this takes the cake! Sure, Valence is going to ship garbage to their partner so the partner's customers will be really impressed. Boy, will that enhance Valence's future prospect. Good grief! Go ahead and bash away, but at least try to come up with something reasonable! - T -