Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Wit Capital - The way of the future? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Baker who wrote (5978)	6/30/1999 2:05:00 PM
From: bh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16809

Has anyone shorted Wit at another broker, to lock in the profit?

To: Mary Baker who wrote (5978)	6/30/1999 2:06:00 PM
From: soylent	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16809

HERE HERE MARY. All these great know it alls couldn't run a dog pound but it is easy to critisize a new fast growing technology. With all their complaints they should pack their bags and go to another broker-- or out of the market altogether! These mavens should also calculate how much these 2 brokers have made them on their lousy $2000 investment! I defy any of the whiners to make more money anywhere on their measly $2k they probably borrowed on their credit cards!

To: Mary Baker who wrote (5978)	6/30/1999 2:07:00 PM
From: eDollar.com	Respond to of 16809

MAry, people fake AR replies as they are worried, the email may be hosed somewhere. If wit has a method to affirm over the web, nobody would fake it. I faked request in old FCFS days when I saw people with later timestamps got AR and not me. i assumed my email was hosed. SMTP is not reliable protocol you know.