SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Strategy for Achieving Wealth and Off Topic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sonny McWilliams who wrote (23972)6/30/1999 3:35:00 PM
From: Ann Janssen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27012
 
Hi All,

Well, I was pleased too see my stocks up after coming back from lunch. Don't forget about tonight though, I'll buy my $5 worth and hope to call in rich tomorrow. <ggg>

usatoday.com

Your right musea, the golden rule has lost a bit of it's luster over the years. I also have a great uncle who is a lawyer and has given me a few pearls of wisdom over the years. Don't volunteer any information. <ggg> That ones hard though, sometimes my mouth brake malfunctions. LOL!!

Have a great evening everyone!!

Take Care

Ann



To: Sonny McWilliams who wrote (23972)6/30/1999 5:28:00 PM
From: musea  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27012
 
Sonny,

The neutral bias almost seems like an apology for the rate hike. A rate hike should never be based on things like the housing market or the stock market and their supposed inflationary effects. If my stock doubles in value, I have to sell it to realize a gain. If I sell it, someone else has to buy it, tying up his money. Where is the increase in money to cause inflation? Same deal with housing, only it's worse because I also have to buy a new house to live in.

My portfolio, which includes LU but not AMAT, CC or BBY, was mostly up today. WCOM is a good company and is on my study list, even though I "forgot" to buy it when it was around $40. Look out above for the 'nets now, as you say.

-musea