SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : BroadVision (BVSN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy who wrote (1633)6/30/1999 6:16:00 PM
From: David R. Doerr  Respond to of 3773
 
Valuing companies strictly on earnings versus growth projections would have left about 65% gains out of the portfolio thus far this year. But if you are trying to do a comparison and understand why BVSN can still go higher, go look at the ratio's of VIGN and NETP versus BVSN. BVSN is a steal compared to two supposed competitors. So I suppose you would also hate some of my other favorites based on your analysis (IIXL,TERN,EBAY,AMZN,SUNW,MSFT,ATHM,LVLT,USIX).

I'm no technical analyst, but I could see BVSN dip back to the mid to low 60s prior to earnings, maybe your short is called for here. BVSN for me will continue to be a long term hold until I hear the story change through the press releases and quarterly conference calls. Good luck.



To: Elroy who wrote (1633)6/30/1999 9:21:00 PM
From: Dinesh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3773
 
> A Porsche is a great car, handles well, has a sleak design, but I wouldn't buy one for $300k

You talk as if a Porsche at its current price
is a steal...

I'm sorry but I couldn't pass that one up. These
fundamentalists crack me up every time they
try to talk of 'valuing' these darn stocks.

As an aside, if BVSN *opened* at $230 next morning,
there will be a long line of analysts wanting to
raise their price targets.

Regards
Dinesh