SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3DFX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patrick Grinsell who wrote (13587)6/30/1999 7:09:00 PM
From: Obewon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 16960
 
Before I take these Matrox numbers at their face value, I wanted to do a little calculation.

Matrox is claiming $473M in revenues, yet at the same time is claiming that they sold 10 million boards and 5 million stand alone chips. Now, assuming all the revenue is due to boards and chips and that chips usually sell for approx. 20-25% of the boards price, we can say that the five million stand-alone chips were the equivalent of selling 1 million boards. Thus Matrox Graphics sold the equivalent of 11 million boards.

Divide $473M revenues by 11M boards and you get $43/board.

I realize that these are one and two-generation old technology but this seems awfully low and still make a profit.

On an added note, who is purchasing these boards? They must be the standard board in many Asian or European brands, because you don't see that many over here in the States.

Obewon



To: Patrick Grinsell who wrote (13587)7/1/1999 1:43:00 PM
From: Marc  Respond to of 16960
 
Dmitry Semyannikov from Metabyte sent us a photo of a
working PGC. Two V3 PCI boards are connected to two
different monitors so you can see each board's part of the
picture. The first board is connected to the monitor on the
table, the second one displays its picture on the floor standing
monitor. The final product of course has both boards connected
to a single monitor via a special circuit that merges those two
parts of the picture.

reactorcritical.com