SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: valuehunter who wrote (17064)7/1/1999 10:38:00 AM
From: Laserbones  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19331
 
Valuehunter...

Your irksome tennis match with Ken aside, there is something that is inconsistent with your presence on this stock thread and your being a DCTC shareholder.

If you have all of these reservations about this company and you are looking for an out at a price higher than where it's at now, it may be in your best interest to resist the urge to hit that "candy-like" submit button as frequently as you do.

Filling the air with constant negativity while sitting on a paper loss is not the way to go. I, too, am a shareholder. I also have serious reservations about DCTC's situation concerning the MMs, but I also want to eventually make money, or at least lose less. With that in mind I'm certainly not going to repeatedly post on a public stock thread that the company I hold shares in has problems because of x,y, and z, again and again.

I don't know about you, but I buy stocks to make money. That is the only reason. Ask yourself if your continual postings about DCTC are likely to increase your chances of making money. If there is another reason for holding stock I am unaware of it. Of course, you are free to express your opinions whenever you want.

My final comment: It is always in your best interest to align your opinions on a public forum with your goals when trying to make money on a trade involving a company that is on the ropes.



To: valuehunter who wrote (17064)7/1/1999 12:04:00 PM
From: Ken Salaets  Respond to of 19331
 
See 17066. eom.