Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Georgia Bard's Corner -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bob sims who wrote (6568)	6/30/1999 11:52:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 9440

That is so true .. so it will have to be proven nby the trading logs that any individual manipulate a stock price ... Since Janice and affiliates are known for their naysaying abilities. I would assume that they would have to have been shorting. This was also mentioned in the filing today. If they did not short then you got a charge that is inaccurate statement. What if they did not make a profit nor benefit in anyway what-so-ever and were merely exercising their opinon based on their DD? Is that considered negligent? Do they not have to been trained in the area of being an analysis in order to be found guilty of expressing an opinion in order to warn people of a possible cost losing scenario? Is not the market and the constitution not the vessel by which we have a right to voice our opinion as long as that opinion has no way to benefit or capitalize? But you are right ... that is why we have our legal system. GB