SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (25356)7/1/1999 7:01:00 AM
From: Bill Fischofer  Respond to of 74651
 
WSJ on SEC flap:

Read it at interactive.wsj.com

MSFT longs will love this part:

Were the SEC to conclude that Microsoft hadn't followed proper accounting procedures, it might force the company to restate its quarterly earnings -- an action that would ironically lead to even higher profit figures.

Analysts said they didn't expect much to come from the probe. "If the SEC wants to force Microsoft to be less conservative, Wall Street will just increase earnings" projections for the company, said Rick Sherlund of Goldman Sachs.


Talk about a "downside" longs can live with. :)



To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (25356)7/1/1999 7:13:00 AM
From: Kevin Hay  Respond to of 74651
 
re: <<Hope I made my point>>

thanks for saving me the typing.

inmho it's somewhat telling that maffei said
'very comfortable' and not just 'comfortable'.

maybe I've been spending too much time interpreting
GreenSpeak, but Maffei's roll is the conservative/guide
the street down guy. 'comfortable' = beat consensus
by ~0.02. 'very comfortable' = beat consensus > 0.02

As far as the sec/reserves in general, no company has ever
been sued for being overly conservative.
***if some one has an example, please share it***
Companies get in trouble with the sec for overstating
earnings, not understating. And this does have nothing
to do with tax accounting.

The worst case is the sec forces msft to report revenue faster,
which could definitely add stock volatility. but any adjustments to
past earnings would be up.

no shareholder harm = no exposure

cheers,
-Kevin



To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (25356)7/1/1999 12:17:00 PM
From: Normandi  Respond to of 74651
 
Dwight.

Glad to have you back posting again.

Cheers
Norm



To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (25356)7/8/1999 12:23:00 AM
From: taxman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
"I worked until 11:30 (PST) tonight on...corporate accounting"

which is why your opinion is worthless. you're just a bean counter and a low level one at that.

regards