SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (135232)7/1/1999 1:33:00 PM
From: LemurHouse  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
I also routinely vote against option plans for DELL and most all of my other holdings for these same reasons. I support your recommendation that all shareholders do the same.

I'm all for compensating successful management. But only at a reasonable level that is tied to performance, and without the accounting subterfuge.



To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (135232)7/3/1999 8:08:00 AM
From: Geoff Nunn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
To Chuzzlewit, re: options assignments
From: Geoff Nunn Saturday, Jul 3 1999 7:49AM ET

Chuzz,

Regarding the options question you recently posted on the income taxes thread (on wash rule applicability) I gather that you intend to undo your covered call position by option repurchase, rather than letting the position run through to assignment. I now have two covered call positions on Jan 2000 leaps, one of them very deep in the money, and have studied the assignment problem, both from the standpoint of transactions costs and capital gains taxes. It is my view that an option repurchase in your situation is almost never right. I believe you would incur lower transactions costs by going the assignment route. In addition, I have concluded that an assignment can be properly configured, by purchasing the right number of additional shares of stock (a figure which is determined algebraically) such that capital gains taxes can be avoided entirely on the transaction.

Here is a brief discussion I recently posted on the issue,

Message 10196120

Would like to hear the reaction of you or others.

Best regards,

Geoff