To: Zeev Hed who wrote (1132 ) 7/2/1999 8:06:00 AM From: Chuca Marsh Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1364
PR or PV:( Tom's remarks about, PR..say it slowly Zeev-TYPO, I hope!) "Reducing the impurities in the wafers would give them an improved effectiveness with a longer life span, and simplify the construction of photovoltaic cells. " TOM S then adds in prior: As mentioned above, this is laughable. (1) it would not simplify the construction of PV cells - which are non-viable due to the high bandgap anyway. (2) In general, impurities have nothing to do with lifespan - it is the metallurgy and the thermal stress history that counts. The improved effectiveness is arguable, although vague. The problems with these materials are more related to crystal defects and doping depth and passivation issues than in impurity issues. In fact, the progress that has been made in the past few years is due in a large part to the successful control of impurities" NUKE NR says: According to the 1999 Industry Report, "Silicon will remain the dominant material for substrates and wafers for the foreseeable future with demand exceeding $7 billion in 1999. True, I haven't checked the number, but it seems about right. However, what does this have to do with SiC and GaN? BASIC PREMISE- The GLUE onto the Silicon CHIP of a Pate of Diamon Dust Plasma to a film of High Temperature S-C NUKE Film that will add life to SiC Chips with a GaN matrix incorporated into a pasted on FILM LAYER BUILD UP that will change applications and increase this and that...bingo factor engineering we are HOPING that they suceed thru proper experimentation and the RULE of necessity is the mother of invention. Chuckastatement And Tom S's early post seemed to disregard the facts that there are 6 seperate TECHNOLOGIES here for that PRICE he is looking for( 13 cents with Nuke at 6+ times that now and more on average lately is laughtable and hurtfull in style and context to current NUKE investors; of which- I remind all lurkers that Tom has no position in NUKE - yet- I am attempting to show a way why he, and Zeev, should CONSIDER TAKING SUCH!!! !) , one JV with Daimler-Chrysler and a Nuclide Battery allready on the MIR and set up to go on the International Space Station, yet at 2 cents a TECH TOM SWIFT GOAL- is not my American Dream, I do feel confronted with half truths with no abstract taking a step backwards to view the whole picture as I would have hoped, it is not fair to come on a thread and say that a recent run to a buck stock is only worth...TWO CENTS PER TECH. There are still some buyers at that level in this stock, and it helping them maintain their comfort level in THE TECHNOLOGY that I endeavour. This company has multiple merit and the ZEEV, typo on technology using the focus of my typing skills in "PR" should immediatly be corrected BECAUSE I AM A DECLARRED PAID IR...to say that the "P" was the only part that was correct. Zeev and Tom, best of the start of a good day to you both. NUKE is worthy. The TECHOLOGY is speculative, and the foundation is solid. Tom, I honestly, think that your logic is too focused in the anti direction, just open up. Less critique on what trained you in the past and think, not on this earth but beyond it into the coolness of space and the CELLS that may be needed there! Just maybe something, again, developed for THE SPACE PROGRAM, will turn into another TANG here, at NUKE TECH. Just maybe. Chucka