SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (24078)7/2/1999 12:29:00 AM
From: richard surckla  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93625
 
Scumbria thanks for the reply. I'm trying to get a handle on all of my research. Too much invested. Kind of put the cart before the horse. But in regards to your reply then I would assume the following taken from another site would be in agreement with you:

<The only advantage to D-RDRAM would be to pack more channels on the same
motherboard real estate. D-RDRAM is a low signal swing differential 16
bit bus and thus requiring 32 lines as opposed to the 64 (+lots of
ground) of the PC133 DRAM. However board layout @ 800MHz is VERY
challenging. The D-RDRAM probably has an edge in bandwidth but inferior
latency as compared to PC133. It will be interesting to see how double
data rated PCxxx DRAMs will perform. That is if the challenges in board
layout will compromise the performance (bandwidth).>



To: Scumbria who wrote (24078)7/2/1999 12:53:00 AM
From: richard surckla  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Scumbria, Some of what I am reading indicates heavy pressure from AMD (I've read some of your posts on the AMD thread). What's your take on the following:

<Athlon is tauted as multi capable, which means an 8 way Athlon 600, with
200MHz FSB and LightWave would be an absolute rage!

Athlon (on paper) does make the PIII "Coppermine" (Socket 370) look a little
insipid, and that's compounded by the fact Intel in their capitalist
shortsighedness (they invested heavily in Rambus Corp) refuses to move to
PC133 SDRAM and will not support it. That leaves us with PC100 SDRAM, PC400
RDRAM, PC600 RDRAM and maybe PC784 RDRAM - problem is that all of those RAMs
are 100MHz.

VIA, ALI and AMD are going have a field day with the 200MHz~400MHz FSB
motherboards for Athlon, using RDRAM and PC100 and PC133 SDRAM.

Finally, if AMD can only get yield up and distribution and pricing right,
they have a chance, for the first time to deliver "power to the people",
rendering power to LightWavers through superior FPU, and give Intel
something of a bashing in the market place until the IA32 "Willamette" CPU
comes out in late 2000, by which time AthlonII will be out using EV7 etc....
this is AMD's *real and only chance* at this and I hope they do it properly.>