Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Wit Capital - The way of the future? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Topannuity who wrote (6060)	7/2/1999 12:34:00 PM
From: lifeisgood	Respond to of 16809

Is there something we're missing here about these new IPOs? If you were insane, you would know.

To: Topannuity who wrote (6060)	7/2/1999 12:38:00 PM
From: eDollar.com	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 16809

Top, I did a very thorough analysis on why the IPOs that came in March are not doing well. It is all because of pricing. (1)Feb: HLTH 8 , VERT 15 PRGY :16 (2)IPO market blossoms , and underwriters get greedy (3)March: ONEM 22, ABTL 23 FCST 25 CDOT 15(a big joke) MPTH 18 TURF 22 Under normal condition, ONEM should be 11, ABTH 11, CDOT 6, MPTH 12, TURF 9, FCSt 12, CAIS 8 (4) June - fear grips underwriters. Price Mail at 7, SRCH at 9, STMP 11, BWEB 12. They became conservative and cautious. This was proven when Solomon saw how Juno at 13 broke syndicate bid. I thought if JUNO was 13 MAIL should be atleas 18. But at 7 it was nothing but panic on part of underwriters. So investors gained on June IPOs