Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SMALL FRY who wrote (48240)	7/2/1999 12:56:00 PM
From: Jerry Olson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 120523

ROFL>>>>>>>>>>>>>>hahahahaha.. tell ME about it...like frozen in cement...????

To: SMALL FRY who wrote (48240)	7/2/1999 1:02:00 PM
From: Burjis S.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 120523

SF....GBIX is finally moving up to... 45!! CNBC is talking good things about it this one, it will fly if EBAY signs up with them, probably worth a $15 per share pop, IMVHO ofcourse! Holding onto my Wig and Dentures as I have the top down on the way to my Beach House! GOOOOOOOOOO GBIX!!! OJ..... IHWY I think this one will move also. Best wishes, Burj

To: SMALL FRY who wrote (48240)	7/2/1999 1:06:00 PM
From: Jenna	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 120523

Sorry about #11 (+23%) being at the bottom of the list, Would you believe I couldn't even find it in the Telescan database and found it solely through an 'exploration' search from Metastock 6.5. when my husband saw me adding in to the list (he's conservative so note that for future reference) he said, "You are sure you want to add that, maybe just put in 10, it looks very suspicious that its not in Telescan, maybe its about to go broke". But I quickly assuaged his fears. Do not pay attention to the rankings of the watch list. Its very random, the way it comes out of the scan, however on occasion, I do like to move #1 and #2 according to my personal preference but anything below #2 is completely random. If I had to rank them according to top 10, its like ranking the top 10 tennis players, has no meaning because the differences in skill in the top 10 is totally inconsequential.