SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Income Taxes and Record Keeping ( tax ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kaye Thomas who wrote (2239)7/2/1999 8:46:00 PM
From: Spots  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5810
 
Good, thanks, Kaye. I more or less suspected something similar
to what you have outlined, and I was wondering if anyone here
could answer the general question with some authority.

As I said in my original post, I have not been seriously
considering this for myself, but I have colleagues who
are doing so, and it was enough to get me thinking and
asking questions about it.

Still, it more or less hinges on the issue of whether the
IRA is a different person which requires a transfer.
That was what I questioned when the ideas was described
to me. As you say, the restrictions on the ISO (qualified)
are very explicit as to transferability, as you outlined.
You confirm my own suspicions. Yet the idea is attractive
enough to pursue a legal opinion from someone who would
have to represent me if it doesn't work. Maybe. Your
description of the "only two ways the IRA can end up with
the stock" virtually mirror my reaction to my collegue
word for word. However, my lawyer specializes in retirement
and estate law and also will answer a casual email
for free if it's well grounded and specific. I may
still run it by him. My guess is that his answer will
be the same as yours <g>.

Thanks for taking the time to respond (and plug your book <GG>).

Regards,

Spots