SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_W who wrote (24110)7/3/1999 5:54:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
<I take anything on Tom Pabsts site with an extremely big grain of salt. He is anything but an unbiased reviewer.>

I've been reading Herr Uberclockermeister's web site for several years now, and I've seen the guy swinging from one side of the fence to the other. More often than not, he's on the anti-Intel side. But then again, he also recognizes the performance and power of Intel processors and chipsets. ;-) This has been proven time and time again by his own tests, which even he can't ignore.

He does a pretty poor job of staying objective, and he does seem easily swayed by anti-Intel FUD (a.k.a. AMD marketing) and anti-Rambus FUD (a.k.a. Bert McComas, a well-know anti-Rambus guy). Nevertheless, I trust his test results more than anyone else's. I just hope that history repeats itself in proving that the results on a pre-production part do not reflect what we can expect from the final version.

Tenchusatsu



To: J_W who wrote (24110)7/3/1999 8:46:00 PM
From: John Stichnoth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Re: RDRAM goes for about six times the
price of PC133 or ten times the price of PC100.


So, how much does PC133 or PC100 cost? I've seen these multiples-of comparisons before, but as in your quote here how much of the memory configuration/board is included in his comparison is unclear.