Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Citrix Systems (CTXS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Buckley who wrote (6732)	7/3/1999 10:01:00 AM
From: dreydoc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9068

Thanks Mike. Here's another slant from Yahoo board for weekend mulling: The latest issue of IBD gives CTXS as 99-88-A-A-A rating. This means that CTXS outperformed 99% of all other stocks in terms of earnings growth. Generally, companies with superior earnings have 75 or above, with the highest possible rating being 99. In terms of stock price performance, CTXS has outperformed 88% of all other stocks. According to IBD, the average relative strength in the models of the greatest stock market winners was 87 before these stocks made their biggest price advances. The industry group relative strength is "A", the highest rating. Citrix's Sales + Profit Margins + Return on Equity is ranked "A", also the highest rating. Finally, the accumulation/distribution rating for CTXS is "A" (which is also the highest rating) and suggests that this stock is under heavy accumulation. People can throw about all this nonsense about Citrix becoming obsolete a year from now, but I also remember people saying the same thing about Cisco several years ago. According to the Cisco critics, Cisco was going to lose market share to 3Com, Ascend, Cabletron, etc., and it just never happended. In fact, when people were talking about the demise of Cisco, that was the best time to invest in the stock. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: 07/02/1999 04:15 pm EDT as a reply to: Msg 4512 by martinm_10