SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JGoren who wrote (33979)7/3/1999 10:00:00 AM
From: CDMQ  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
Here we go again?
Qualcomm is hit with new patent rights
suit

GTE alleges unauthorized use of phone technology

By Mike Drummond
STAFF WRITER

July 3, 1999

Qualcomm, which recently fended off one patent-infringement lawsuit from an offshore
rival, now finds itself drawn into another on the home front.

GTE Wireless, one of the nation's five largest service providers, is suing Qualcomm for
alleged unauthorized use of patented technology in mobile phones.

In a federal lawsuit filed this week in Virginia, GTE said some Qualcomm phones use a
GTE technology that prevents cellular phones from connecting to unwanted service
providers when customers wander or "roam" outside a normal service area.

The so-called '728 patent, short for the company's U.S. Patent No. 4,916,728, is valuable
to GTE because the technology directs cell phones to connect with service providers
with which it has reciprocal billing agreements.

GTE said Qualcomm's use of the technology could allow competing carriers to block out
GTE service in the Virginia market, in effect turning its own technology against it.

"Qualcomm's unauthorized use of the '728 patent provides it and its customers with an
unfair competitive advantage," stated the complaint, a copy of which was obtained by
The San Diego Union-Tribune.

GTE said Qualcomm was aware of the patent through its involvement with various
wireless standards-setting bodies, but used the technology in question anyway.

"Qualcomm's infringement has been willful and deliberate," the complaint said.

The lawsuit marks the first time a major domestic carrier has sued the San Diego
company, and trails the far-reaching patent-infringement settlement Qualcomm reached
with Swedish rival Ericsson in March.

That settlement was widely seen as a victory for Qualcomm, boosting its stock price
and potentially positioning the company's code division multiple access, or CDMA
wireless technology, to become a global standard -- representing to mobile phones what
Windows is to personal computers.

In the settlement, Ericsson agreed to purchase a money-losing business unit from
Qualcomm, and to pay it continued royalties for CDMA-based products.

Now, Georgia-based GTE either wants Qualcomm to enter a licensing agreement, or
wants an injunction preventing the San Diego company and competing service
providers from using the technology.

GTE also is asking for unspecified monetary damages.

Qualcomm spokeswoman Christine Trimble said yesterday that the company had just
received the complaint. She declined further comment.

GTE said it selected Virginia as its legal battleground because it represents a $100
million market and is home to about 350,000 GTE subscribers. GTE noted that it is not
currently using its patented technology in Virginia, but plans to later this year.

Ironically, GTE Wireless is among nine original partners that will use services provided
by San Diego-based Wireless Knowledge, the Qualcomm-Microsoft joint venture that
lets various types of portable devices access information housed on corporate desktop
computers.

"This is a suit dealing with a specific patent-infringement case," said GTE Wireless
spokeswoman Susan Asher. "This should not apply to any other relationships we have
with Qualcomm."

Copyright 1999 Union-Tribune Publishing Co.



To: JGoren who wrote (33979)7/3/1999 10:03:00 AM
From: JRH  Respond to of 152472
 
The only "repair" button I am aware of for Microsoft products is the "remove" one. That usually makes everything work ;o)

Justin



To: JGoren who wrote (33979)7/3/1999 5:11:00 PM
From: Morgan Drake  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
I'm using Win95 updated through Service Pack 2. I'm also using I.E. 5.0.