To: genejockey who wrote (7689 ) 7/3/1999 1:41:00 PM From: SlateColt Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11417
Might I jump in here. Actually, I love hearing that Wave is in Barrons. Exposure, exposure, exposure. The guy interviewed has a cursory knowledge of Wave and their technology. And, he certainly doesn't understand the market. Mr. Stern: Exactly, the lay person doesn't care if its a chip. He could care less what it is, as long as he gets what he wants. If the chip is on the motherboard or on some peripheral device unbeknownst to Joe, he doesn't have to care about it or use it for that matter. But, I'm willing to bet that if there is enough compelling content available, Joe will bite and have access to Everything Digital. As far as revenue splits, content providers are practically banging down the door to get on board. Surely, they expect the increase in revenue to offset the higher fees. If not, what a bunch of dummies! And remember, higher volume (and maybe higher clout) providers keep more of the dough than the numbers you state. How much revenue has Intel's R&D shop brought in? $0.00 That's right zilch, it's not until the fruits of their labor go into production when the money starts flowing. Well, Wave just finished 12 years of R&D growing the Embassy tree. Only now is fruit getting ripe. They are now in the beginning stages of production, the aftermarket first and then OEMs. Visa's great....as a no-brainer magnetic strip...for purchasing hard goods. What Visa can't do (even with SET) is provide persistent copy protection or support new business models like pay per view, or rent-to-own. They also sell your name to mailing lists. Wave won't do that. You're comparing apples to oranges. On the marketing front, Wave will jointly market with their partners, Hewlett-Packard, IBM and others. Would you say HP and IBM have marketing clout? Thanks again Barrons, ---Slate