Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tickertype who wrote (12720)	7/3/1999 5:28:00 PM
From: MGV	Respond to of 27311

Pleased to rain on your parade. You can thank me later! : )

To: Tickertype who wrote (12720)	7/5/1999 12:44:00 PM
From: William Epstein	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Tickertype; I can't speak to Larry Brubaker's repetitious posts. I don't read all of them. As to his opinion. I may not necessarily, agree. However, he did provide some facts that are new information for myself. For that I am appreciative. Perhaps, his penchant for repetition made it possible for me to obtain the information he provided. What I don't appreciate and I am sure Larry doesn't either, is characterizing him as a shill for someone else when the party he is writing to doesn't agree with his analysis or doesn't like the facts he presents. As you know I am experiencing the same thing here. My creditability is being questioned without warrant by several who don't like the facts I have presented. Yet they have nothing of their own to disprove what I have presented and when I gave them the source of my information as Larry did they don't want to research it to find out if its true. Larry may have some characteristics that may annoy you. However, his credibility should not be slandered by the other party without just cause. The point is, that if we slander credibility every time we don't like something no new information, good or bad, gets through. Bill