Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pallisard who wrote (12732)	7/3/1999 8:24:00 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Hey Pallisard: Just checked in after a day of tennis, tennis, tennis. Larry up to the same. Did you notice how Larry got pissy with his "master" Zeev. Larry's pissed at all the longs and Zeev isn't patting Larry the way he likes. TOOOOOOOOBAD!! Hey what's more important is Agassi and Sampras in the Wimbledon Final a couple of Yanks in the The Championships....On the 4th of July!!!! Now forget Valence for a day and enjoy the final tomorrow. An American gonna win this race. Same as Valence in the Li/Poly race

To: Pallisard who wrote (12732)	7/3/1999 9:28:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27311

Pallisard, do you really think I am paid to post negatively about the stock? Then I guess I was also paid to post positively about it back in late '97 when I originally bought the stock? Do you really think the stock price would be 10 cents different than its current price if I hadn't made a single post on this thread? I have nothing to do with the fact that VLNC has spent $150 million for over 7 years without making a dime. If you are looking for paid shills, I suggest you start with the posts of those whose "knowledgeable sources" have been so wrong for all these years.

To: Pallisard who wrote (12732)	7/5/1999 1:09:00 PM
From: William Epstein	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Pallisard; Perhaps, Larry is annoying. However, what evidence can you present that he is a paid shill for someone else. How do I know you aren't a shill for a different party. If someone said you were I wouldn't believe it without solid proof. Isn't he entitled to the same consideration? As far as my being long, I am long 8000 and there are others on this thread who can verify it. I paid 8 3/16-8 1/4. It is true because I have said it is. Do you have evidence to the contrary? We must all assume that contributors are faithfully telling the truth, as they see it, unless they are proven liars. Then they deserve no consideration. If we cannot do so, then nothing anyone provides has any value to any of us. Bill