SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nawien Sharma who wrote (36458)7/3/1999 11:59:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116753
 
Nawien, yes. But as I said, it may take anywhere between 20 to 50 years. There is nothing that I know that violates the law of Physics in low temperature transmutations. Fermi did some of this work in the late thirties. There are a lot of problems with heavier nuclides, but with Deuterium, there is a good chance that in the presence of heavy nuclides, the less likely reaction in free space (two deuterium nuclei fusing to yield an alpha particle) may be dominant, and this reaction does not involve massive amounts of useless radiation and is the richest energy yielding reaction, yet the problem of energy conversion will still be a major barrier, not so much the stability of the fusion reaction process, which right now, is still the major hurdle.

Zeev



To: Nawien Sharma who wrote (36458)7/4/1999 8:27:00 AM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116753
 
<<Cold Fusion ? Do you really believe that?>>

I believe it, the cold fusion part. I think we could see economical cold fusion in 12-30 years.