Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NCDR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Arthur_Porcari who wrote (1290)	7/4/1999 2:39:00 PM
From: lindend	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1440

If you are named in a suit here, you pay your own lawyer. And counter suits will cost you even more money and you will rarely win. I never said they wouldn't initially be out of money. What I said is if the suit is groundless, it is my understanding that the plantiff could be ordered to pay court costs. I could be wrong, but I've seen cases where this has happened. Goldfinger admitted on another board that he shorted this stock at $7 on the 25th of July, after it started trading again. I suspect, if true, that it will cost him. First, you used a plural term when referring margin calls and you have no idea of their initial entry position. Second, IMO, $7 is $6.99 more than what NCDR is worth. I think Auric isn't sweating this one. Again, unless you have access to their brokerage account balances, you have no business making such unsubstantiated statements. If they have any "naked" shorts in the accounts they will be bought in right away. Reminds me of quote: "If ifs and ands were pots and pans there'd be no use for tinkers hands." Why are you throwing such baseless allegations out there??? Do you have ANY reason to think they have naked shorts? As you know, I owned a brokerage firm, so I do know what I am talking about. Sorry Art, all I know is that you've claimed you owned a brokerage firm. Virtually every statement you've made to me so far has been proven false. For instance, I find it hard to believe that if you really were a broker that you didn't know BB stocks were shortable. If you really were a broker and didn't know this, I don't think it reflects too well on your knowledge as a broker.

To: Arthur_Porcari who wrote (1290)	7/4/1999 5:04:00 PM
From: Q.	Respond to of 1440

Percarrie, re. <<As you know, I owned a brokerage firm>> And as you know, the NASD said that you ripped off a bunch of small investors, when it suspended you and slapped you with a fine that you didn't bother to pay. re. <<, so I do know what I am talking about>> we've seen already that you don't. For example, when you've claimed repeatedly that it is illegal to short BB stocks. (Lots of us here know that respected brokers and clearing firms do allow it because in fact it isn't illegal. ) re. <<I admit that most of the microcaps are trash>> At least for the ones you've been involved with, yes, here we have something with a ring of truth.