SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Edwarda who wrote (43653)7/4/1999 5:11:00 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
As Dr. Laura said, morally he has a duty to the child but suggested he sue the mother. Fraud by fellacio or some such thing.



To: Edwarda who wrote (43653)7/5/1999 1:15:00 AM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 108807
 
I don't think there's any way out for the guy, the law about child support isn't like criminal law, lack of intent isn't a defense, as the innocent party here is the kid, who didn't ask to be born. I might add that we only have his word that the man never engaged in intercourse with the woman, which strains credibility IMHO.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News