Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard James who wrote (2506)	7/5/1999 1:27:00 AM
From: Joe Groovy Dude	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 19428

Richard James - what are you talking about? R.I.C.O. charges is NOT civil!!! IMO, these guys/gals deserve what is coming for them, and it sure ain't CIVIL.

To: Richard James who wrote (2506)	7/5/1999 1:41:00 AM
From: scouser	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19428

Richard you may be correct, I was looking at this part at the time. However Mr G would look nice in a criminal suit- a striped one that is ;-) XI. SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION: WASHINGTON'S CRIMINAL PROFITEERING ACT (RCW 9A.82 ET SEQ) 11.1 Paragraphs 1.1 through 10.6 are incorporated as if fully set forth herein. 11.2 Plaintiffs sustained injury to their business and property by act of defendants' criminal profiteering that is a pattern of criminal profiteering. 11.3 Defendants' act of securities fraud is criminal profiteering under RCW §9A.82.060(4).