Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ekn who wrote (40053)	7/5/1999 2:19:00 AM
From: genejockey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

ekn, this post rocks and is officially in my library of great posts. Most of my posts were geared to how hopeless WAVX's business model was assuming = penetration to Visa et al. Even with 100% market penetration, WAVX is doomed. However, I totally agree with you that WAVX will not get market acceptance, and doubt if a 10% transaction cut on an unproven revenue source will be enough of an inducement to get a large box maker to be willing to put in a WAVX chip and assume liability. Even if 10% were enough of an inducement, that still dooms WAVX because that is an extra 10% that a company like Visa does not need to charge on a transaction.---gj

To: ekn who wrote (40053)	7/5/1999 8:53:00 AM
From: Jesse Livermore	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

EKN <----- isn't this an old WAVX long who sold and wants to buy back at a lower price? I would discount his comments. Tomorrow he might just as likely post the stock is going to $100 and Intel is knocking on Peter Sprague's door licking its lips. He is an interesting fellow. He loves WAVX long term but wants to get more shares cheaper, misinformation is a tool, an ends to a means. So if you are buying his comments Caveat Emptor.