Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Fred Thornell who wrote (32132)	7/5/1999 9:25:00 AM
From: Ditchdigger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Hi Fred, it is slop like that which keeps me from bothing to register with RB.The head in the sand attitude appears prevelant over there. "(With minor exception no PP converson has been recorded or proved)." why the hell do you think they are raising the authorized number by a factor of 3?..DD PS: was just going over my trading slips from 98 sold on 12/17 @ .515

To: Fred Thornell who wrote (32132)	7/5/1999 9:37:00 AM
From: Ditchdigger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Fred, what a pisser, eh? DD(but note-it still ain't cheap enough,IMO) Talk : Market Trends : Three Amigos Stock Thread \| Previous \| Next \| Respond \| To: max90 (11414 ) From: Ditchdigger Thursday, Dec 17 1998 10:08AM ET Reply # of 16156 Max,sold TSIG @ .515,looking to buy it back cheaper<g>..D

To: Fred Thornell who wrote (32132)	7/5/1999 9:39:00 AM
From: Zeev Hed	Respond to of 44908

Fred, I am surprised that this simple mechanism is not understood. As long as there is no, or only minimal conversion of the debt to stock, the death spiral continues, using the debt as collateral for additional shorting. When the debt is fully converted is what we have called in the past "the end game" (that was the signal to buy GATE at $.5 for a rally to the mid 2'), often accompanied by huge volume. In the case of TSIG, we have one of the worse floorless, it is a "leaky floorless", like the one that has decimated TTRIF from $3 to $.05, and RNTK from $3 or so (if memory serves) to a low of $.25). In a leaky floorless, the company keeps going to the well for more money at progressively lower stock prices. Follow the share count, follow the outstanding debt on the floorless and when you see the share count blow, you know that the majority of the "then" outstanding debt has been converted (and used to replace shares sold short). All the minirallies like that one day wonder last week, are used by shorters to just increase their profits, on the back of the like of MakeMoney that keep buying and will not sell until it reaches $.20. That number will be reached, alright, but IMHO, that will not happen until a massive reverse split has occurred. Zeev

To: Fred Thornell who wrote (32132)	7/5/1999 9:48:00 AM
From: Ditchdigger	Respond to of 44908

Fred, one more for you (you can't say I didn't warned you-as pointed out, starting in late Nov.)later,DD exchange2000.com bigcharts.com

To: Fred Thornell who wrote (32132)	7/5/1999 3:13:00 PM
From: Timelord	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Fred, If I were to look at this stock chart, I would be much more inclined to question the motives of individuals who continue to provide soothing words in the face of a stock price decline of over 92%: bigcharts.com So Ditch has been posting since November? It seems he had been pretty ineffectual in his self-serving campaign for about 5 months. Oh, and then there is that nasty price decline from .62 to .05 since around April 23, just like some folks have warned would happen. Oh perfect! We'll just make the price decline their fault, and everything will be rosy again! Especially, the big question is why must they be here? Why is Ditch or Al even here. Surely not for our benefit. If for not our benefit than for whose? Future possible investors? Yea, right. Therefore, if it is not for our benefit then it must be pure and simply, for their benefit. I've seen those words in every single thread where there was a floorless. Sometime I would like an explanation as to how the shareholders who end up losing their money, "benefit" from being encouraged to ignore contrary opinions and unquestioningly hold their stock until there is nothing to hold but worthless paper… Alex