To: mauser96 who wrote (6739 ) 7/5/1999 12:24:00 PM From: MikeM54321 Respond to of 9068
Lucius, Well I would say I agree with all your latest comments. The Java solution that Sun pushed a few years back, Corel went full blast to convert their Office Suite to(and then dropped the program), appears to be pretty much dying. As we all know, this type of Java (where applets are sent to client) was supposed to be a Microsoft Killer. Since that is dying, now it appears this new form, "Java/HTML," appears to be taking it's place. With Larry Ellison leading the battle charge. And I agree, it is the platform du jour and maybe you are correct about the article's slant on it's chances of success. They are just trying to be cool. By the way, didn't you think it strange, the article, in all it's many pages, never mentioned Oracle by name? Notice they also call this new, "Java/HTML," paradigm a MULTITUDE of names. You would think if it was going to dominate the thin client market in two years, they would at least call it something consistent<VBG>. Here's the list: Web and Java Technologies Web-oriented Web-centric HTML/Web-oriented _________ Well Lucius, sounds like you and I are are pretty much at the same spot. Not only in understanding this new Web-oriented paradigm that is supposedly a threat to Citrix's thin-client alternative, but also in our view of Citrix's investment potential. Heck, Citrix is selling a lot of product on a steep upward curve(and making real money!). I'm sure that is what 90% of investors care about anyway. And did you catch my previous post on Microsoft's workstation (NT) market. It's still very strong at least into 2003. It's been great to hear your views and how you appear to have pretty much paralleled my understanding of the Java/HTML threat. If you find anymore articles that may help enlighten us more on this threat to Citrix, please post them. Thanks, MikeM(From Flordia)