SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: flatsville who wrote (6292)7/5/1999 5:12:00 PM
From: John Mansfield  Respond to of 9818
 
egroups.com

'Subject: Harlan Smith in his July Y2K ranking at www.russkelly.com
From: Roleigh Martin@tc.umn.edu


Harlan copied me on this. Quite good.

>Russ,

A flood of information that's difficult to roll up into an overview,
but I see that the progress is not being made at the rate necessary to
have a reasonably good success.

I change my ranking from 6.0 to 7.0

Statement:

"Lots of good reports but ...

Too many loose ends not being tied up.

Too much uncertainty about oil supply and foreign supply lines in general.

Too much self reporting that successful remediation is at severe risk -- e.g. Washington DC, Ventura County.

Too much government and banking propaganda as undesirable replacement for independent audit of progress.

Too many news blackouts for areas in trouble -- US Post Office, Department of Veteran's Affairs.

Too many deadlines being pushed out to September through November -- US Army

Too many superficial tests being run as propaganda ploys -- FAA, NERC

Too many real tests unsuccessful -- L. A. sewage and elevator failures.

Too many programmers unhappy about progress being made.

Too few BCCPs (Business Continuity and Contingency Preparation) plans from federal agencies -- none?

Too late amendment to Executive Order establishing 40-person ICC (Information Coordination Center)

Too few community action groups, too poorly focused.

Too much continuing escalation of federal remediation budget that doesn't even comprehend contingency preparations.

Too many foreign countries half awake.

Too few met June 30 deadline.

Too little understanding of the implications of minor problems -- July
1st start of fiscal year.

Too few signs of life from Al Gore, whose presidential campaign depends on Y2K success.

Too tepid responses from U.N. and G8.

Too much litigation commencing -- GTE suing insurers for $300 million.

Too little news on real status of embedded systems problems.

Too much secrecy on government preparations -- News blackout on evacuation route signs appearing on Michigan Interstates

Too much exaggeration of the problem by "doomers", minimization of the problem by "Happy Faces" and lack of objective factual information by the large majority.


Harlan

PS I anticipate that my August ranking will increase from 7.0 to 8.0
as the situation continues to deteriorate and I see no effort of
substance underway to effect a turnaround. ICC is a small whiff of
fresh air, but we will see no report from them until September at the
earliest.

-----Original Message-----
From: Russ Kelly [mailto:kellyr-@innova.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 23:20 Subject: July ranking due

Hello Experts,

We need your latest rankings, and a statement if you wish, for
russkelly.com.

_________
Russ Kelly
rus-@russkelly.com
The Year/2000 Awareness & Information Site
Visit russkelly.com




To: flatsville who wrote (6292)7/5/1999 5:15:00 PM
From: John Mansfield  Respond to of 9818
 
'''... The Y2K movement needs a variety of speakers,'' Martin says. ''What you can get away with depends on the size and type of your audience, and the weight of the speaker's words. Bill Clinton would tank the economy if he said the things I'm saying, but I have only a research audience. I'm just one person. I don't represent a group. I represent myself.'''
...

pioneerplanet.com