Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Cohen who wrote (12775)	7/5/1999 2:47:00 PM
From: MHS	Respond to of 27311

Robert, Interesting link -- does bring to mind of where Wee Willie is. mhs

To: Robert Cohen who wrote (12775)	7/5/1999 3:52:00 PM
From: John Curtis	Respond to of 27311

Robert: Interesting link. And I see some of the defendants hail from Boca, eh? The heart of "Maggot Mile" of southeastern Florida. Now why am I not surprised. Heh! John~

To: Robert Cohen who wrote (12775)	7/5/1999 4:08:00 PM
From: Pallisard	Respond to of 27311

Good post, Robert, I hope the company wins. My case is: Opinions are not easily DISPROVABLE. Half-truths are not DISPROVABLE. Statements taken out of context are not DISPROVABLE. Clever distortions of statements are not easily DISPROVABLE. My ANALYSIS and CONCLUSION about Larry is not PROVABLE. Provability doesn't even exist in practicality in our entire justice system. Proof ends up being a concensus of opinion about presented alleged facts, where the simpler the situation, the more easily discernable is the actual truth value. A whiz-bang attorney can talk a jury out almost anything. My conclusion about Larry stems from his presentation, and constant repetition of negative interpretations, here and on the Yahoo thread, that seem to be out of proportion or inappropriately persistent with NO REAL MOTIVE or at least one we've yet to discover. I do NOT apologize for my conclusion.