Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: QwikSand who wrote (17618)	7/5/1999 2:33:00 PM
From: Martin Milani	Respond to of 64865

I was not saying you were.....someone else is....!

To: QwikSand who wrote (17618)	7/6/1999 1:19:00 AM
From: Mephisto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 64865

I also worry about Sun's lack of execution on the desktop appliance. PPP has nothing to do with it. Getting a vision off the drawing board (where it's been for too long) and into the marketplace does. What' wrong with McNealy & crew? They had better get their bums in gear!! Or they will hear from their shareholders. Mephisto

To: QwikSand who wrote (17618)	7/6/1999 12:59:00 PM
From: Stormweaver	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 64865

Qwik, as we discussed earlier SUNW think's it's above the desktop since they ignore it and invest next to $0 in it ... yet McNeally is the most vocal anti-MSFT consortium member ? What's wrong with that picture...I'll tell you... The failure to execute a real desktop strategy has a very vocal anti-MSFT McNealy hoping that the DOJ will do something to MSFT so that he can can get a 2nd chance in the desktop market with his half-thought half-implemented thin-client approach. SUNW has done absolutely zero to make the Solaris desktop any better since CDE and now their whining to the DOJ hoping that the DOJ gives MSFT a whippin to slow them down since technologically SUNW can't compete with MSFT on the desktop.