Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Curtis who wrote (12781)	7/6/1999 8:56:00 AM
From: MGV	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Interesting questions regarding mooter75 raised on Yahoo Count 1 The filings of last week once again convinced me that Lev's optimistic comments had little of substance supporting them (as was the case with the "on the cusp" remark, which he made 9 months ago, about the time I last bought the stock). The fact that somebody was unloading large blocks into the pre-conference call strength also helped convince me this was one more false alarm. That wouldn't have been you, would it mooter? You wouldn't try to talk the stock up with your constant predictions of imminent contracts and then sell to the unwitting dupes who believe you, would you? Nah. I'm sure you have some other motivation for why you and your knowledgeable sources have been predicting imminent contracts since 1997. Count 2 Mooter claims to have sold large parts of holdings when there were problems with the "Klocker" laminating machine clunker, then to have bought back in when the problems were solved. How did one find out that there were problems with the Klocker? This was not announced in company news, and Valence shills at the time were hooting up the stock. There was no notice of this on their webpage, either. So just how does one find out such crucial information, and how does one know that such is not now the case?