Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : KOB.TO - East Lost Hills & GSJB joint venture -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (3246)	7/5/1999 8:45:00 PM
From: grayhairs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15703

Bob, I presently have no "insight" into the testing plans. But, drawing from my own experience, I would be very surprised if they run any "conventional" DST's. They may look at running a bottomhole DST (with packer set in the casing) at some point (Eg. when at TD) but I wouldn't even bet on that. My best bet is no DST's at all. Just drill to TD (or first problem). Run logs. Case it. Then complete and test through casing. The main objectives of a "test" are to determine if commercial rates are possible and if the reserves are limited in extent. In this particular case, however, methinks the zone was tested before the well was drilled. <gg> We don't really "need" a test this go around. The very highest priority of this well has to be to find out how much gas saturated column there is in that expected 2,000 foot gross pay interval. I doubt that they will want to risk losing the well over a DST. JMHOBWDIK. Later, grayhairs