Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James R. Barrett who wrote (43877)	7/5/1999 5:51:00 PM
From: jbe	Respond to of 108807

Well, that's good for a start.... :-)

To: James R. Barrett who wrote (43877)	7/5/1999 7:52:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Two niggles. One: "to assault". Aieee! Joan ...?? Two: making it categorically unlawful to kill. That's more draconian than what we have now. Self-defense should be a recognized "out".

To: James R. Barrett who wrote (43877)	7/5/1999 8:41:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

I bet as soon as your neighbor put in a pig farm next to your house there would be a fourth law. It is unlawful to commit nuisances. Then when your wife ran off and left you with all the kids and refused to pay any support, there comes another law. And so it goes ... BTW, under your legal system, driving would be a bit hazardous, no? Of course, since there is no law making it illegal not to pay taxes, you wouldn't have any money to build roads. And, of course, you wouldn't have any money to pay police to enforce your three laws. Well, sounded good for a while, there.