Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dolfan who wrote (45869)	7/5/1999 9:29:00 PM
From: E'Lane	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Hi Mark! Had a very fulfilling 4th! Hope your's was terrific! Ok...to clarify comments concerning Clarent. <g> I do realize that this is a good sign for Digitcom. If a start up company can fly like Clarent did, then a company such as Digitcom with the miles and years it already has under it's belt should be a no brainer. It's almost enough to make a person be a bit excited at the prospects. My point was simply that I am ready to become a greater part of that niche...NOW! <g> Yep, ticked me a bit, and I had a bit of the old "pooch my lip out, stop my foot, hands on hips, it just doesn't seem fair" thang going on. Also, I just found it fascinating that (as this article stated) it just sorta came out of no where. I was actually surprised that no one else had even noticed it; (or at least mentioned it). Oh, and for those who think I bought CLRN...Nope, my telephony investing dollars are tied up in another little company. <g> Lastly... A patient investor environment is just what Clarent needs while it gets a firmer handle on cash. At the end of 1999's first quarter, the company posted an accumulated deficit of $13.6 million. But management appears to be addressing certain cost containment issues. Net income losses declined slightly last year to $5.4 million, or a loss of $1.00 per share, from $5.8 million, or a loss of $1.65 per share in the prior year. THIS is a $38 dollar stock??? Come on Jimmy...let's get those financials in. I'm sure if we can show "only" a .50 loss per share, we will be a $76 stock! <g> Ok, so that was sarcasm, but still... Thinking time is complete...NEXT! E!