SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Vitesse Semiconductor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JZGalt who wrote (2682)7/6/1999 8:43:00 AM
From: OldAIMGuy  Respond to of 4710
 
Hi Dave, After VTSS being pretty flat from the first of the year through April, it sure has been sweet.

techstocks.com

Best regards, Tom



To: JZGalt who wrote (2682)7/6/1999 12:31:00 PM
From: Chuzzlewit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4710
 
Dave,

Thanks for your reply.

how do you justify a p/e of < 30 for these stocks last year when interest rates were 4.75% and now p/e's > 50 when interest rates are hovering around 6%?

Earnings expectations change, and as I said before, the market is notoriously myopic. And remember, a year ago the market was obsessed with Asian problems, and last Fall the obsession was South America. In any event, the issue I was addressing was target pricing.

In other words, the outcome of the projection for a stock with interest rates at 1% is almost twice that of interest rates at 2%. Now if you think about it, isn't that just a bit silly?

Of course, and that's why you need to use risk-adjusted discount rates. In other words, the denominator needs to be the nominal interest plus a risk premium. Obviously, during periods of turmoil the risk premium increases substantially, and that's what happened last year.

One final point. Stocks in general have outperformed in periods of inflation in the 1970's when they had pricing power and when the make up a significant part of the indexes.

Siegels' point is that companied do have pricing power during inflationary periods, although there tends to be a lag between the onset of inflation and the manifestation of pricing power.

Getting back to the impact of interest rates, typically I subtract the real interest rate (interest rate - inflation) from the projected growth number before calculating a PEG based on forward 12 month eps.

I use a different approach. Instead of worrying about interest rates I have developed a metric I call CNPEG2. I normalize the YPEG by dividing through by the YPEG for the S&P500, and then multiply the resulting ratio by the beta. The interpretation is now immune to the effects of interest rates (because of the S&P normalization), and presumably the beta takes care of risk adjustments. Now you can use the decision-making rule of CNPEG2 <1 is a buy.

TTFN,
CTC