Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocket Red who wrote (22411)	7/5/1999 9:27:00 PM
From: ddl	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26850

Say what? Here's my interp. 180 drill holes estimates 21.9MM tons 140 drill holes estimates 8.5MM tons with 90% confidence. Both are clear of waste rock. The difference is a few more holes are needed to place the 21.9MM tons into the feasabilty as it says... "with a limited amount of in-fill drilling, a significant portion of tonnage....can be converted within the confidence interval used in the above (8.5MMtons) table. IMO, it says with a few more holes we can probably say we got 21.9MM tons under the NW pen with everything under the lake and north shore not even taken into consideration yet!!! Am I reading this right?