Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MGV who wrote (12798)	7/5/1999 11:58:00 PM
From: Rich Wolf	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Yah, sure, Markie. This is a forum for discussing the potentiality of this company, based on their technology, factory development, and the marketplace. We've discussed those issues in depth, but you never do. Once again, I challenge you to address the issues specific to this company. Do you doubt they will continue to obtain incremental financing until they can do a secondary at a higher price? I don't. Do you doubt the veracity of the company's statements that they will be in the black by the fall quarter, not even accounting for orders beyond Hanil and Alliant? I do not. Do you question the existence of the factory in NI, or the 190+ employees, or the acceptability of the product being produced? I do not. Do you acknowledge that the CEO stated in an interview for the London Financial Times that just with the current three assembly lines they can produce 30 million cells per year? This is true and accurate. We've dissected every step of their process, and deduced that they are now finally at the inflection point, where they can entertain volume orders. Do you acknowledge that the company stated the product they just sent out for evaluation, manufactured by these high-speed production lines, far exceeds the performance of any other li-ion or li-poly product as regards energy density (equiv., run-time of the device)? Exceeds by measures from 30 to 50 to 100%, depending upon the devices being compared? They so stated. It's a fact. I've only ever posted independently verifiable information, and hence you have never been able to refute anything I've posted.