Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe Groovy Dude who wrote (2532)	7/7/1999 10:10:00 AM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19428

Slander or more correctly libel or defamation, in this case, by definition, is something written by some party about another party that's damaging to reputation and is UNTRUE. Was Auric being untruthful? Show me the money bubba... Prove it to me. Your just on the opposite end of the trade and are pissed that someone dares to try to reveal the TRUTH. Good luck LOSER. As for the law suit, the plaintiff must prove here that Auric was malicious and knowingly lied with intent to damage the company. The court must decide if damage was done and assess damages. IMO, it wont even get to discovery (if you know what that is). Even if, these cases are difficult to prove and the courts are often in favor of the defendant. Remember how your country holds dearly the tenants of 1st Amendment rights (if you know what that is). But, you've already made up your mind here... I guess you should be judge jury and plaintiff.