Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2875)	7/6/1999 1:35:00 PM
From: donald martin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4504

<< if we get good grades on #3,#4, #5. >> You know, this is why I chafe at arguments about good management/bad management, or whether this or any other mining stock is a pump and dump or over promoted or what have you. Is it not within the realm of possibilities that the grades will come back 0.6% CU with correspondingly low grades of Zinc, Silver and Gold? Isn't it also possible that we could see grades of, ok, I'll pull a number out of the air, 2.5% CU with similarly high grades of the others? And however it comes out, I can see now, one group of posters here is going to gloat and declare themselves the "smart" ones and the other group of posters as hopeless losers and idiots. In fact, with MAN at C$7ish right now, how does it differ much from coin toss? (In case anyone's wondering, though...I'm still long.)