SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Enigma who wrote (36667)7/6/1999 1:37:00 PM
From: paul ross  Respond to of 116753
 
From USA Gold:

MARKET REPORT (7/6/99): In one of the strangest
market reactions I have seen in my 26 years in the
gold business, gold took a hit today after the Bank
of England auction was oversubscribed 5.2 times and
Japanese banks refused to buy U.S. Treasuries
because of impending potential Y2K problems. Now
normally those of us of sound mind and temperament
-- possessed of a rational approach to life --
would have been led to believe that two such
seminal events would turn the market decidedly
higher, but not in this topsy-turvy world of
Alice-in-Wonderland finance. Instead we are led to
believe that this extraodinary demand for gold is a
bearish development destined to drive the gold
market lower.
The B0E gold went out at $261.20 per ounce -- a
price that would not send gold owners running for
their safety deposit boxes to make sure their gold
is still there; but enough to make most rational
individuals think that the auction bidders were
somewhat determined to obtain yellow metal. Helen
McCaffrey at N.M. Rothschild & Sons (before New
York opened) called it a "fairly good result." "The
fact that it was 5.2 times oversubscribed," she
went on, "indicates that there is appetite at these
levels and below."
As we are all finding out, Ms. McCaffrey, no one
should under-estimate the wherewithal of an
institution(s) or fund(s) short the market and
fearing for their financial survival ( e.g.,the
Nick Lesson Effect). How else do you explain
someone shorting the market under these
circumstances? It certainly does not have to do
with substantial downside when you are bumping
against (a) the cost of production in 75% of the
world's gold mines; (b) the International Monetary
Fund sales likely being stymied in Congress; (c)
world wide consumption at record levels; and, last
but not least, (d) a lack of mobilizations of gold
reserves at the central banks (despite what we are
being told by the mainstream media nearly every
day). It is totally irrational and irrationality is
usually associated with its close cousin --
desperation. I return to an earlier thesis that
those shorting this market might not be interested
in profiting from the short positions they assume.
Instead, they could very well be protecting another
aspect of their gold trading book -- the carry
trade business.
So, the only way to get the price down is to get it
down with paper -- through the derivatives' market
and that is what happened this morning. And the
only sensible reason I can come up with for driving
it lower is to acquire physical metal as cheaply as
possible. In this way, the BOE is either being
played for a dupe by the gold buyers, deliberately
destroying the pound, or bailing out some
institution for reasons we don't know at this time.
It's going to be fun to watch the shorts and the
mainstream media try to explain today's gold market
action as criticism and the questioning of today's
events rises to a crescendo levelon both sides of
the Atlantic.
The obvious question is: With the auction being
over-subsribed by five times, why wouldn't the
over-subscription now overflow into the free gold
market -- if that's what we can call it -- and
initiate a price run-up? We'll watch to see if the
buyers don't come in as today's trading session
moves forward. If you were short, I should think
that you might have some concerns in that regard.
If you wanted to buy, I would think that this $6
drop would be an incentive.

usagold.com