Where we differ:<<..the burden of unreasonable and unachievable expectation placed upon them, they would have been able to do their due dilly and research in relative obscurity..>>
There are metals in the alluvials and they are in larger quataties than the average of the Carlin trend. They are there so their must be a CUSTOM MILLING that must be R&Ded to form an extraction method that is true to economies to scale for LARGE BULK TONNAGES. A market and thus, marketability is based upon several factors here for the future. IT WILL NOT BE BASED UPON DRILLS and Chaiun of Custody, yet will only relate to the Economies od Scale all based upon scaracity. The runs can sometimes be nil, as the treatments, pre and post, can be economic ON AVERAGE. There is no need for a LeDoux yet maybe an average of Modified Fire assay of the Cons can make a difference to investors, to be patient. I hope that the subtle differances in these sentances are not too confusing.
Will this buck stock go up based on true value. I think so. Will your favories go up based upon value, I hope so. Value added is all that needs to be reseached. On average, high grade cons will be economic if checks ensue. BTW, I just noticed that a BOD guy at Naxos is Mr Bruce Downey, is he the same Bruce Downey that worked on Maxam Gold's old test runs a few years ago and with Bob Barefoot as a Partner ...wrote, " The Great Basin Gold Discovery July 6, 1994?" Starnge how things might work out. Naxos uses the Dam Mongoose. LOL DCRS ? Maybe just a common name, maybe there is a reason that Maxam and MG stress ( and GPGI with there 3 different types of ore sources)...CUSTOM MILLING.
HERE is page #2 I found: KEY points part #1 also::
#1
THE GREAT BASIN GOLD DISCOVERY
By Bob Barefoot, July 6, 1994
A new and abundant of gold has been discovered. The gold occurs as sulfate salt-encapsultated micron gold. ln natural is found in hematite (hydrated iron oxide) sand, but it can also be found in the sulfide tailings of copper and gold ores. It has remained hidden from man's fire assay gold gold analysis as the acid salt reacts with the sodium carbonate the fire assay flux to generate large volumes of carbon dioxide gas whiich propel the encapsulated gold as a froth to the top of the assay cup which it cannot be entrapped by the ccouring lead in the flux. It lead in theilux ( known as "acid slag effect" in assay and mining journalss ). The encapsulation blocks the gold frpm vision, as well as...causing numerous analytical difficulties. However, once salt has been removed ( Patent Pending) the gold is assayable by Certified Fire Assay!
Note- Rest of scan is messed upo
~or decades bttndnedt of ~ate~ ~ labo~tones" all over the daoial dtaina~ ~ ~~yen'ng ~ of the lo~ ~tates of ~tah~~1jIOrni~ ~cvu~di and Anzont
'The G1eal Btain ) have been ~ 5~h hematite ore ~LSt~
~ ~~oc~e$ and ~ of gold that We~ ~ beyond the tetlm of crtd'bility. The profCSsio~~~ on tics eou~d not ~ the wo~ ~tng the tied and ~~ven ee~fied fl~ ~y, and tlt~ dismiSSed all auch clairns as l(aud'11~~~ The aLzLhOt. apolo~~UY d£ni.ts to being part of the igr~~~I't clorus. Act~lly, the ~OCCd~5 ~sed by ~ of the ~ laos wt!C ~~~ives of the totaby acctpt~ble ~ of ~ ~ and c~pel foY two ~ ~ umas the as~Y ~~blern$ ca~~ by acid slag ate well 6oco~~ed tn both assay and ~ining jou~L The r~ that thi p[Uf~i~ ~mtnUfltty ~ ~~bie to the high ~ was ihat neithe~ ~y~or thei~ atnate~ ~ ~ the probLem and. theT~fort, did not 1~5~an~ ~ the ~ ~ with dthydrat~ Wt~ioh inC~CS~~~t ~ipj~tion and ~ ~ the pr~blctn ef time i.. ~~ng ~ onett has leren ~~ognized~ and the teml ~ scnsit'Ve ore' has been coined.
~ofetsio~l ~ologisls reiect the cl~detti,,,ne)ab. Ii, ~ding$ for, the followhug rtasons:
~3fcStiOfl~~l ~ ~ect the clandesune lab ftndin~ for the Iollowin~ r~asQns'
l Th~ are Lin~ble to ~ the ~ with third pa'~Y ~ fire Ls$gy5.
2. ~ey arc ~~~ble to duplicate the results with the sattle ~ n thi~ partY labs..
3, They arc u~blCto ~~ethC ~~ld with ftflelec~n ~iOrOscoP~.
4 ~ ~de of the gold in ea~h deposit ti al~vays t~hi~to be explained hy an'Y knoWn ~1O~L~l CItou1~~'
5 The thickneSs and artal e'ctettt of each depostt is so v~t that the rtSCf~et ~mplitd by ~cn ~posit wOuLd ~ th, cur~~~r16 gold rcScTVeS elteady ntj~d.
6. Oth~r pr0~iO~~S~ ~a3yst5 and ~~ta~lurgiStS ~~tc with their conclusions.
7, No one has evet ~ ~ined such deposita.
THE GREAT BASIN GOLD DISCOVERY
By Bob Barefoot, July 6, 1994
A new and abundant of gold has been discovered. The gold occurs as sulfate salt-encapsultated micron gold. ln naturc ti ts found in hematite (hydrated iron oxide) sand, but it can also be found in the sulfide tailings of copper and gold ores. It has remained hidden from man's fire assay gold gold analysis as the acid salt reacts with the sodium carbonate the fire assay flux to generate large volumes of carbon dioxide gas whiich propel the encapsulated gold as a froth to the top of the assay cup which it cannot be entrapped by the ccouring lead in the flux. It lead in theilux ( known as "acid slag effect" in assay and mining journalss ). The encapsulation blocks the gold frpm vision, as well as...causing numerous analytical difficulties. However, once salt has been removed ( Patent Pending) the gold is assayable by Certified Fire Assay!
Note- Rest of scan is messed upo
~or decades bttndnedt of ~ate~ ~ labo~tones" all over the daoial dtaina~ ~ ~~yen'ng ~ of the lo~ ~tates of ~tah~~1jIOrni~ ~cvu~di and Anzont
'The G1eal Btain ) have been ~ 5~h hematite ore ~LSt~
~ ~~oc~e$ and ~ of gold that We~ ~ beyond the tetlm of crtd'bility. The profCSsio~~~ on tics eou~d not ~ the wo~ ~tng the tied and ~~ven ee~fied fl~ ~y, and tlt~ dismiSSed all auch clairns as l(aud'11~~~ The aLzLhOt. apolo~~UY d£ni.ts to being part of the igr~~~I't clorus. Act~lly, the ~OCCd~5 ~sed by ~ of the ~ laos wt!C ~~~ives of the totaby acctpt~ble ~ of ~ ~ and c~pel foY two ~ ~ umas the as~Y ~~blern$ ca~~ by acid slag ate well 6oco~~ed tn both assay and ~ining jou~L The r~ that thi p[Uf~i~ ~mtnUfltty ~ ~~bie to the high ~ was ihat neithe~ ~y~or thei~ atnate~ ~ ~ the probLem and. theT~fort, did not 1~5~an~ ~ the ~ ~ with dthydrat~ Wt~ioh inC~CS~~~t ~ipj~tion and ~ ~ the pr~blctn ef time i.. ~~ng ~ onett has leren ~~ognized~ and the teml ~ scnsit'Ve ore' has been coined.
~ofetsio~l ~ologisls reiect the cl~detti,,,ne)ab. Ii, ~ding$ for, the followhug rtasons:
~3fcStiOfl~~l ~ ~ect the clandesune lab ftndin~ for the Iollowin~ r~asQns'
l Th~ are Lin~ble to ~ the ~ with third pa'~Y ~ fire Ls$gy5.
2. ~ey arc ~~~ble to duplicate the results with the sattle ~ n thi~ partY labs..
3, They arc u~blCto ~~ethC ~~ld with ftflelec~n ~iOrOscoP~.
4 ~ ~de of the gold in ea~h deposit ti al~vays t~hi~to be explained hy an'Y knoWn ~1O~L~l CItou1~~'
5 The thickneSs and artal e'ctettt of each depostt is so v~t that the rtSCf~et ~mplitd by ~cn ~posit wOuLd ~ th, cur~~~r16 gold rcScTVeS elteady ntj~d.
6. Oth~r pr0~iO~~S~ ~a3yst5 and ~~ta~lurgiStS ~~tc with their conclusions.
7, No one has evet ~ ~ined such deposita.
ice. and that once again thc '9experts" are wrong. ~owever. this ice age i~ not the one that is belic"od to have created the massiv$ hematite ~old deposits. The geological Pleistocene era which created the Great Basin arbd which ended 30,000 y~ars ago, is believed t( be responsible for the nuinerous and 'nassive gold deposits
The tirst question thAt ~ust be ari5~~d is whe~ did all of the gold come from '? The ~lvgist only has explanations for deposits o~ly a tiny fraction of the sizt of the hematite depo5i~ Th~s uripublished explanations must be postulated. To begin ~vith,
~ know thaI gold conieS from the molten bowels of the ~vth Most of the massive ~ld deposits known today exist thousands of feet below the surface in Pre~ambr'an Rock (over 500,000,000 years old). The real question to be answ~red is how did such a massive amount of s~h gold"eriii'chcd l're-Ga~briin rock end up on the ~urface as he~atite sand? Wbcn we look today at the most rn~ive surface deposit of gold that is lcnown to exist today, we are looking at the Carlin trend which was produced by a massive fault, which h~~6 the lower Pre~ambrian Ore ~ the surf~ce, and then flipped over (ow' its belly) exposi~ all of the ore at the surface. Any laytnan would expect that what has proven to h~ppea once geologically, must have happ~ned rrLany tin~es ~f6re. Then whe~ arc the oth~ Carlins?
Lets suppose, just for the sake of argtunent. that hundreds of Carl~ns e~isted in the northeni United States and Car'~ in pr~~glacial tiinCs. When the glaciers came, they would have ~ound up th~sc carb~type ~posits. The amo~ of ice wa£ so rt~assive that it lowered the surface of the oCeVis aboL[t 650 feet. Thus when this utassive amount of ice melted, it [eleased oceans of water, which w~ trapped by the mountain ranges in the westein United States This forc~ the tlLrbuient flow (~ water mnd gold bearing Pa~ Cambria~i rock debris to pass into the Great ~asin creatin~ huge lakes. The flowing water flushed the lighter mjn~~lg so~h into Mexico and the Pacific ocea~.
The next question to be answered is how did a granitic Pre-Cambric Rock end up as a hematite sand? The answer lies in the science of mineral diagenesis which is a FANCY name for the "Study of how minerals are altered when exposed to the changing environrnents of nature." If a gold-rich granitic rock is ground up in the laboratory and flushed with a large volume of water for several years, the result would be a hematite residue containing gold.
Chuca would call this akin to Paleo Channel Tech of the XRAL SGS Lavalin Group aka :
mmigeochem.com
WHAT I CALL MMI- sand channels.....Sediments explained 101-202
EOM no more editing...advise if Bobs Phone Number in Arizona is wanted...by PM or chucalo@aol.com
... the defect scanning continues...This is the DCRS - differential Charged Theory that was the start for many of us to UNDERSTAND the Models of the needed study...even the STUDY of a Brine in the Prairie golde Model - of Birch Mountain - !
The octehedral micno~~ gold would have been liberated ~m the ~ulfides ~s th~y oxidized, under water, into sulfate~. and the res~ltirt~ sulfuric acid would have reac'.~d ~jih the caibonates to liberate the calcium The re~u!t would be a positively .~urface charged octahednI gold crystal being ~urround~d by the ~egatively charged '~alf~te ion v/hich subse~uently attracts the positively c~~r~cd calcium ion, resulting In the c'i.capsulation by prec2p*:tation of calcium ~ulfat~ ar~und the gold. In nature, the '~~.is of turbulent water move the micron gold as if it '~re an ion thu~ r~sulting in a "elatively even widespread deposit. The breaking ice ~~yns result in the liberation of water tidal waves that flush th~ clays, generated by the hy&~tion of the granitic feldspa~'s, as well a£ the soluble salts, ....
E
#2( old TEXT BRIDGE OUT OF CONTEXT)
ice, and that once again the "experts" are wrong. However, this ice age is not the one that is believed to have created the massive hematite gold deposits. The geological Pleistocene era which created the Great Basin and which ended 30,000 years ago, is believed tc be responsible for the numerous and massive gold deposits.
The first question that must be answered is where did all of the gold come from ?
The geologist only has explanations for deposits only a tiny fraction of the size of the hematite deposits. Thus unpublished explanations must be postulated To begin with, we know that gold comes from the molten bowels of the Earth. Most of the massive gold deposits known today exist thousands of feet below the surface in Pre-Cambrian Rock (over 500,000,000 years old). The real question to be answered is how did such a massive amount of such gold-enriched Pre-Cambrian rock end up on the surface as hematite sand? When we look today at the most massive surface deposit of gold that is known to exist today, we are Jooking at the Carlin trend which was produced by a massive fault, which lifted the lower Pre-Cambrian ore to the surface, and then flipped over (on its belly) exposing all of the ore at the surface. Any layman would expect that what has proven to happen once geologically, must have happened many times before. Then where are the other Carlins?
Lets suppose, just for the sake of argument, that hundreds of Carlins existed in the northern United States and Canada in pre-glacial times. When the glaciers came, they would have ground up these Carl in-type deposits. The amount of ice was so massive that it lowered the surface of the oceans about 650 feet. Thus when this massive amount of ice melted, it released oceans of water, which was trapped by the mountain ranges in the western United States. This forced the turbulent flow of water and gold bearing PreCambrian rock debris to pass into the Great Basin creating huge lakes. The flowing water flushed the lighter minerals south into Mexico and the Pacific ocean..
The next question to be answered is how did a granitic Pre-Cambric rock end up as a hematite sand? The answer lies in the science of mineral diagenesis, which is a fancy name for the study of how minerals are altered when exposed to the changing environments of nature. If a gold-rich granitic rock is ground up in the laboratory and flushed with large volumes of water for several years, the result would be a hematite residue containing gold. The octehedral micron gold would have been liberated from the suICides as they oxidized, under water, into sulfates. and the resulting sulfuric acid would have reacted with the carbonates to liberate the calcium. The result would be a positively surface charged octahedral gold crystal being surrounded by the negatively charged sulfate ion which subsequently attracts the positively charged calcium ion. resulting in the encapsulation by precipitation of calcium sulfate around the gold. In nature, the oceans of turbulent water move the micron gold as if it were an ion. thus resulting in a relatively even widespread deposit. The breaking ice jams result in the liberation of water tidal waves that flush the clays, generated by the hydration of the granitic feldspars, as well as the soluble salts, south through Mexico and into the Pacific ocean. In summary, the mineral alteration procedure produced by nature can be duplicated in the laboratory, and thus <<the proposed postulation Is viable.>>
Chucka |
