Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Famous SI PIG ZSUN DISCOVERY QUESTIONS THREAD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter V who wrote (16)	7/6/1999 3:46:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 96

"The text of the complaint has been deleted from SI" Wow, are you sure about that? It was posted so repetitively, SI Bob must have had to have worked for an hour to get every copy. Barb

To: Peter V who wrote (16)	7/6/1999 5:06:00 PM
From: CatLady	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 96

"What was the basis for jdx? Diversity? It's pretty risky naming specific does in a complaint that may wreck diversity jdx." Could you please translate into non-lawyer terminology?

To: Peter V who wrote (16)	7/6/1999 7:23:00 PM
From: R.E.B.	Respond to of 96

Agreed, jurisdiction is established if one of the parties resides in the Federal District. Venue is proper if there is a federal question involved or a diversity of citizenship between the states. I don't know if anyone has been served or not but in my opinion, someone must have been served (at least one person) otherwise it might be improper to release the contents of the lawsuit by the plaintiff or to publish it publically until service has been made. Hard to tell from here in Texas. I might print a copy of it from R.B. and contact the clerk and ask if service has been made and wen answers are due. Stay tuned.