Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Andrew Cook who wrote (2886)	7/6/1999 4:17:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Respond to of 4504

<<By the way, Claude, what was your impression of the depth where the Sulphide intercepts began?>> A body starting at depth of 150 meters is starting to look more underground than open pit... no doubt about that. Still, the key will be in the grades and continuity of these deep sulfides. << Seemed like a tough comparison against the relatively shallow TG-1.>> Not necessarily, do you prefer 40 meters of 3%-6% copper or 250 meters of the same grade? Nobody can tell what we may get... but we have a showt at some holes with > 100m intervals of high grades stuff. It is too early to conclude anything but the fact that MAN has discovered a huge VMS deposit that has unknown grades of copper, zinc, lead, and silver. << Sorry, again I'm not strong on the in's and out's of the geology. But is it possible that TG-3 parallels TG-1 with respect the the oxide cap (and corresponding gold)? >> I guess there is no oxidized cap at TG-3 otherwise, they would have report it.