SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (44233)7/6/1999 5:01:00 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Interesting. According to DOJ, in 76 number of murders was close to equal for men and women killed by intimates; violence against males has gone down faster than against females. Not what I would have expected. Ratio now is about 3-1 (nowhere near the 99-to-1 suggested earlier on the thread).

Nonlethal crimes of violence were between 5 and 6 to 1. I'm surprised it's that close; I would have said closer to 10 to 1. Obviously I underestimate the amount of female-on-male violence.

FBI shows violence basically 3/4 against women and 1/4 against men. Again, more against-men violence than I would have expected.

I didn't read the reports closely enough to see whether there was a significant amount of same-sex violence either way. Just because a man is the victim doesn't mean a woman had to be the intimate, and vice versa. Sons on fathers, daughters on mothers, etc. But still, a higher percentage of male victims than I would have thought.

Good to have some real data to look at instead of just arguing from anecdote or personal experience.